Application program Performance

Microsoft Excel 2007 seems to favor the Intel processors and American Samoa such provides a rather one sided conflict. The Phenom II X4 965 is beaten by both the Core 2 Quadriceps femoris Q9400 and Q8400 processors, while the Core i5 650 is also faster. The Phenom II X4 965 is just able to tucker the Core i3 540 which matched the performance of the Phenom II X4 925 processor. The Phenom II X2 555 was out and away the slowest processor in this program, losing to the Core 2 Duo E7500.

Exploitation WinRAR this time we ingest conducted our own bench mark by transcription the time in seconds information technology takes to compress a single large file as well as multiple smaller files. The Meat i5 750 is out and away the best acting processor here, followed by the Phenom II X4 965. The Phenom II X4 965 was a divide faster than the Core i5 650, while the slower Phenom II X4 925 beat the Core 2 Quadriceps femoris Q9400 and Q8400 processors.

The Phenom II X3 720 took 23% longer to compress the 700MB charge when compared to the Phenom II X4 965, while the Phenom II X2 555 took 36% yearner. The slowest processors present were the Core i3 540 and Core 2 Duo E7500. The Core i3 540 took 281 seconds to complete the task, making it 11% slower than the similarly priced Phenom Two X4 925.

The Photoshop CS4 benchmarks don't reveal much, though this is some other popular program that appears to prefer Intel processors. The Core i5 750 was the fastest central processing unit tested, beating the Core i5 650 by a small margin. The Phenom II X4 965 was 7% slower when comparing the HardwareHeaven benchmark data.

The program clearly relies more on processor time travel rapidly than numbers of cores. This is evident when looking at at the Phenom II X2 555 results, which arranged this processor well in advance of the triplex-core Phenom II X3 720 C.P.U., generous information technology a 10% performance advantage. This was also the case when comparing the Phenom II X2 555 to the Phenom II X4 925.